[pybsddb] set_location semantics problem
Anton Belyaev
anton.belyaev at gmail.com
Fri Jun 5 20:30:04 CEST 2009
2009/6/5 Anton Belyaev <anton.belyaev at gmail.com>:
> Hello,
>
> I've been debugging a strange problem with the library. Here is the
> short (the shortest I could make) snippet, reproducing the problem:
>
> import bsddb # or import bsddb3 as bsddb - all the same
> db = bsddb.btopen("test.db", cachesize=2**20 * 64)
> db.set_location('0000000001_') # DB_NOTFOUND, ok
> db['0000000001_00000012442207344433'] = 'data'
> db.set_location('0000000001_') # ('0000000001_00000012442207344433', 'data'), ok
> db.next() # DB_NOTFOUND, ok
> del db['0000000001_00000012442207344433']
> db.set_location('0000000001_') # DB_NOTFOUND, ok
> db['0000000001_00000012442207425114'] = 'data'
> db.set_location('0000000001_') # DB_NOTFOUND, WTF?
> db.set_location('0000000001_') # ('0000000001_00000012442207425114',
> 'data') - calling it again - ok
>
> At the line before the last line, set_location cannot seek to the key,
> while it should be able to!
> Moreover, same set_location again, the seek succeeded.
>
> Please help to solve this.
>
> Python 2.5.2, i686.
>
>>>> import bsddb3
>>>> bsddb3.__version__
> '4.7.6'
>>>> import bsddb
>>>> bsddb.__version__
> '4.4.5.3'
>
> Thanks.
> Anton.
>
I've made a simple fix to solve this. Just chage set to set_range in
_DBWithCursor._checkCursor method.
Is it a correct solution?
More information about the pybsddb
mailing list